Is Political Feminism Finished?

Political feminism is the push to elect women to high office, such as the U.S. Senate and the Presidency. Two out of the last three Democrat nominees for president have been women, and their campaigns ended in crushing failures.

In Maine, the very formidable two-term Governor Janet Mills appeared to be a shoo-in for the Democrat nomination to run against the incumbent Republican Susan Collins. Kamala Harris won this deep-blue state by 7 points in 2024, and traditionally that margin increases in the midterm elections in favor of the party not in control of the White House.

Mills faced off against Trump himself at an event held for governors at the White House early last year, when Trump called out Maine on the transgender issue. Mills told Trump that she would see him in court, to the thrill of liberals nationwide.

EMILYs List, the preeminent group supporting feminist candidates, praised Mills as “the first woman to be elected as a district attorney in New England,” and the only female attorney general and governor in Maine history. She won her last election in 2022 by 13 points, which was the largest margin for a statewide Democrat there since 1988.

Her opponent is a political newbie named Graham Platner, who is an oyster farmer with a checkered past that includes a Nazi-linked tattoo and posts unsympathetic to women on Reddit. EMILYs List says that “Graham Platner’s comments blaming victims of sexual assault are unacceptable and disqualifying.”

But Platner is a progressive endorsed by Bernie Sanders, the senator for nearby Vermont. Progressives seem to be taking control of the Democrat Party away from liberal feminists.

The latest polling shows Platner with a phenomenal 33-point lead over Mills. Platner is so far ahead for the June 9th primary that he is starting to steer his campaign ads to target his November opponent, Susan Collins, rather than focus on Mills.

Meanwhile, after just a few months on the job the approval rating of Virginia’s new Democrat Governor, Abigail Spanberger, has plummeted below 50%. The pollster State Navigate observes that she is the “most historically unpopular governor at this point in the most recent Virginia governors’ terms.”

The feminist wife of California Governor Gavin Newsom, Jennifer Siebel Newsom, is not helping his presidential ambitions. She insists on being called “First Partner” rather than the traditional title of “First Lady,” in order to push the DEI mindset.

She’s accused some Christians of “living in this silo, this evangelical, conservative silo that, ultimately, is just pulling us back as a country to a time and a place where we don’t deserve to be, and we’re not going to be.” Her husband tried to shut churches down in California during Covid, while allowing some businesses to remain open, and the Supreme Court ruled against that.

Jennifer Newsom added, “young women and fathers of daughters are awake now, and they’re woke, and they’re not going to let us go back.” Gavin Newsom and his woke wife are struggling in early polling among contenders for the 2028 Democrat presidential nomination, trailing behind Kamala Harris who lost last time.

Meanwhile, there is backlash by young men against feminists in South Korea, where birth rates have plummeted to the lowest in the world, thereby endangering the long-term survival of the country. A survey last year found that roughly 50% of men in their 20s and 30s agreed with the statement that “There needs to be a movement that honors masculinity and advocates for men’s rights.”

Over the last half-century feminists have passed many laws that continue to cause harm today. These include programs that profit from turning women against men, and family court procedures that deprive men of their rights of fatherhood.

In 2015 the Obama Administration fully placed women in combat roles in our military. Our ground troops and warships, which are now in harm’s way near Iran, are coed with women and men.

Phyllis Schlafly warned 50 years ago that ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment would result in court-ordered taxpayer-funded abortions, and she successfully blocked that terrible idea from ever becoming part of the U.S. Constitution. Feminists pretended that Phyllis did not know what she was talking about, but time has proven her correct.

On Monday, a 4-3 decision by the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court ordered taxpayers of our fifth-largest state to start funding abortions there, based on its state ERA. The court used the same contorted logic that Phyllis predicted would be used by feminists to force the public, against the conscience of many, to pay for abortions.

As a state court decision grounded in state law, the U.S. Supreme Court cannot overturn this on appeal. Advocates for ERA back in the 1970s insisted this would not happen, and yet it just did.

John and Andy Schlafly are sons of Phyllis Schlafly (1924-2016) and lead the continuing Phyllis Schlafly Eagles organizations with writing and policy work.

2 thoughts on “Is Political Feminism Finished?”

  1. FEMINISM UNLEASHED!

    “Political feminism is the push to elect women to high office, such as the U.S. Senate and the Presidency.”

    Political feminism (rampant on both sides of the imaginary aisle) is the push to elect women to *any* public position in government (regardless their Party affiliation) – unleashed upon America with Article 6’s Christian test ban whereby (and more importantly) the Bible’s mandatory biblical qualifications for civil leaders (e.g. Exodus 18:21, Deuteronomy 17:15, etc.) were likewise eliminated, including Exodus 18:21’s male only requirement.

    Enhanced with Amendment 19 that provided women the “right” to vote,* and thereby to elect their own gender to public office:

    “Moreover thou shalt provide out of all the people able MEN, such as fear God, MEN of truth, hating covetousness; and place such over them, to be rulers….” (Exodus 18:21)

    “As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.” (Isaiah 3:12)

    “But I suffer not a woman to … to usurp authority over the man….” (1 Timothy 2:12)

    This is not to say that the men in positions of civil leadership are any more biblically qualified than are today’s women – they’re not.

    You can thank Article 6’s Christian test ban on both counts.

    For more regarding Article 6’s Christian test ban, see Chapter 9 “Article 6: The Supreme Law of the Land” of free online book “Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective” at https://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/biblelaw-constitutionalism-pt9.html

    Then Chapter 28 “Amendment 19: The Curse of Women’s Suffrage.”

    *See blog article “Constitutional Elections: Dining at the ‘Devil’s Table'” at https://www.constitutionmythbusters.org/constitutional-elections-dining-at-the-devils-table/

  2. FEMINISM UNLEASHED!

    “Political feminism is the push to elect women to high office, such as the U.S. Senate and the Presidency.”

    Political feminism (rampant on both sides of the imaginary aisle) is the push to elect women to *any* public position in government (regardless their Party affiliation) – unleashed upon America with Article 6’s Christian test ban whereby (and more importantly) the Bible’s mandatory biblical qualifications for civil leaders (e.g. Exodus 18:21, Deuteronomy 17:15, etc.) were likewise eliminated, including Exodus 18:21’s male only requirement.

    Enhanced with Amendment 19 that provided women the “right” to vote,* and thereby to elect their own gender to public office:

    “Moreover thou shalt provide out of all the people able MEN, such as fear God, MEN of truth, hating covetousness; and place such over them, to be rulers….” (Exodus 18:21)

    “As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.” (Isaiah 3:12)

    “But I suffer not a woman to … to usurp authority over the man….” (1 Timothy 2:12)

    This is not to say that the men in positions of civil leadership are any more biblically qualified than are today’s women – they’re not.

    You can thank Article 6’s Christian test ban on both counts.

    For more regarding Article 6’s Christian test ban, see Chapter 9 “Article 6: The Supreme Law of the Land” of free online book “Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective” at bible versus constitution dot org. Click on the top entry on our Online Book page and scroll down to Chapter 9.

    Then Chapter 28 “Amendment 19: The Curse of Women’s Suffrage.”

    *See blog article “Constitutional Elections: Dining at the ‘Devil’s Table.'” Search title on our Blog.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *