Big Pharma, Big Media and Big Tech are gaslighting America, faking like the Pfizer mRNA vaccine has been “fully approved” by the FDA and using that as an excuse to demand full vaccine compliance.
What exactly was approved? Did the approval go to BioNTech, a German vaccine corporation, for a Chinese Virus injection that does not exist yet? BioNTech partnered with Pfizer to produce the current shot being used under the EUA. It turns out, however, that this is technically a different shot than the “Comirnaty” branded one referenced in the FDA’s recent approval announcement.
Dr. Robert Malone knows what was approved. NewsTarget say, “According to Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of messenger RNA technology, “the official FDA documents do not indicate, based on his own reading, that full approval for the Pfizer injection currently in use has arrived. That, he says, is coming around 2023.” (See full two min. interview with Malone at the Newstarget site above.)
But if you want to get the shot that was “approved.” Is it available?
According to Dr. Robert Malone, the main force behind the invention of the shot, who got it, gave it to his daughters, and is now against it, in answer to “is that FDA approved shot available?” His words, “It is absolutely not available… the little trick they have done is issue two separate letters for two separate vaccines… the Pfizer vaccine is still under EUA and still has liability shield… the mainstream media has lied to you… The product that IS licensed is the BioNTech product (the Comirnaty shot, by Pfizer), which is substantially similar but not necessarily identical, and it is not yet available, they have not yet started manufacturing it or labeling it.”
“And the Comirnaty one is the one the liability waiver will no longer apply to, so the one licensed is not available, and when it is available, it will not have the liability shield. The one that does have the shield is the Pfizer shot, still under the EUA. So there is no change, and the press, as usual, has not done its homework. The EUA for Pfizer does not allow, as currently stands, for use in children under 16.”
More from the Defender
The Defender tells us that “The FDA decrees that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine under the EUA should remain unlicensed but can be used “interchangeably” (page 2, footnote 8) with the newly licensed Comirnaty product.”
“Second, the FDA pointed out that the licensed Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine and the existing, EUA Pfizer vaccine are legally distinct, but proclaims that their differences do not “impact safety or effectiveness.”
“(But) There is a huge real-world difference between products approved under EUA compared with those the FDA has fully licensed. EUA products are experimental under U.S. law. Both the Nuremberg Code and federal regulations provide that no one can force a human being to participate in this experiment. Under 21 U.S. Code Sec.360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III), authorization for medical products for use in emergencies, it is unlawful to deny someone a job or an education because they refuse to be an experimental subject. Instead, potential recipients have an absolute right to refuse EUA vaccines. U.S. laws, however, permit employers and schools to require students and workers to take licensed vaccines.”
But here is the rub: At least for the moment, the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine has no liability shield. Vials of the branded product, which say “Comirnaty” on the label, are subject to the same product liability laws as other U.S. products. So, yes, go ahead and sue. And, by the way, if you are injured by the EUA shot, good luck getting any money.
The Defender goes on to add, “The government has created an extremely stingy compensation program, the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program, to redress injuries from all EUA products. The program’s parsimonious administrators have compensated under 4% of petitioners to date — and not a single COVID vaccine injury — despite the fact that physicians, families and injured vaccine recipients have reported more than 600,000 COVID vaccine injuries.
In sum, per what the Defender says about the non-approval of Comirnaty, “Because adults injured by the vaccine will be able to show that the manufacturer knew of the problems with the product, jury awards could be astronomical. Pfizer is therefore unlikely to allow any American to take a Comirnaty vaccine until it can somehow arrange immunity for this product.
Given this background, the FDA’s acknowledgement in its approval letter that there are insufficient stocks of the licensed Comirnaty, but an abundant supply of the EUA Pfizer BioNTech jab, exposes the approval as a cynical scheme to encourage businesses and schools to impose illegal jab mandates.
The FDA’s clear motivation is to enable Pfizer to quickly unload inventories of a vaccine that science and the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System have exposed as unreasonably dangerous and that the Delta variant has rendered obsolete.” This means that only the EUA authorized shot, for which no one has any liability, will be available.
Per Defender: “The FDA has not approved the Pfizer BioNTech vaccines, nor any COVID vaccines for the 12- to 15-year age group, nor any booster doses for anyone. And the FDA has not licensed any Moderna vaccine, nor any vaccine from Johnson & Johnson — so the vast majority, if not all, of vaccines available in the U.S. remain unlicensed EUA products.
Only if it says Comirnaty is it licensed. If it says Pfizer-BioNTech, it’s an experimental product. Under 21 U.S. Code 360bbb (Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute), you have the right to refuse. If it comes from Moderna or Johnson & Johnson (marketed as Janssen), you likewise have the right to refuse.